Today's conversation was between a young man and older gentlemen who were discussing the morality of determining how a person contributes to society. The younger man said that ultimately we have to decide when to let someone go because, essentially, they are causing more problems than solving them. Which, from the looks of the body language of the two, didn't set well with the older gentleman. In all reality, it shouldn't sit well with anyone.
In light of the recent videos released concerning Planned Parenthood's selling of the dismembered parts of aborted children though, this topic seemed highly relevant.
While the news explodes over the death of Cecil the lion in a big game hunt, where is the media outrage over the fact that innocent children, made in the image of God, in possession of an eternal soul were not only brutally murdered in their mothers' womb, but were then dismembered and sold. To what depths has society sunk in that an atrocity such as that is not greeted with unanimous uproar and demand for justice?
The reason there isn't such a response is because we live in a world where a the value of a human soul in the eyes of their fellow humans is determined by their 'value.' Not the value of their inherent worth as a child of God, but their value to the societal whole. What can they do? What are they worth? What is their contribution? Are they 'valuable'?
Yet in order to make these rationalizations, the values system used by society is based on man made notions and significance factors. Which means that each persons' value placement will vary based on subjective beliefs and conscience formation of those assigning placement. And in an instant gratification and result driven society, those whose contributions to the greater good is non apparent or whose affect is gradual are considered menial and unnecessary for the 'greater good.'
But in the end, those who place value and judgement based on their own morality are affected negativity as well. Similar to Ronald Reagan's saying, "I have noticed that everyone who is pro-abortion has already been born," those who claim the authority to decide who is or isn't a contributing member of society primarily consider themselves the cream of the contribution crop and outside the evaluation of their peers for the greater good of society.
Ultimately, the point that I'm trying to vocalize, and tend to ramble on about, is that the value of a person and their eternal soul is something that can only be given through the objective moral compass prescribed by the maker and lover of the soul itself...God. Who better than the originator?
Amazingly, we have the ability to see how God says each soul measures up. In fact, He tells us Himself. In 1 Samuel 16:7, God says, "The Lord does not look at the things people look at. People look at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart."
Look at the example of Mother Teresa. The people she spent her life around, in the eyes of the 'greater societal good' had no value. The man dying from malnutrition and laying on the road was just seen as taking up space. The child who had no one to care for him was a waste of effort. Yet she poured her life out for them. Why? Why spend your days in the dredge of people who can never return the favor, and in reality, may not even make it back out of the hospital.
Because they deserve love. Despite what they can or cannot give. The beauty of the gift of giving though is that you can never give out of the love of your heart without receiving blessing in return. "Our life of poverty is as necessary as the work itself. Only in Heaven will we see how much we owe the poor for helping us to love God better because of them." (Mother Teresa)
And even if you look at your relationship with God, you find that God loved you despite the fact that you can never repay Him. If anything, we owe our lives to Him simply because He gave His while we were still sinners.